A lot of the worst US banks are in the same category.
That’s according to new research by Credit Suisse.
Credit Suisse says it’s the biggest report on the banks’ creditworthiness ever done by a US bank, and it’s based on more than a decade of credit ratings.
This is the first time the Credit Suse analysts have put the credit ratings on banks and how they’re doing in terms of overall performance.
They say the study shows that credit rating agencies are failing the American public, but it also shows that many of these ratings are in fact overrated.
In the US, credit rating companies, like Standard and Poor’s, Moody’s and Fitch, have been struggling to find any positive results from their ratings.
It’s hard to get any real sense of how well the banks are doing, so credit rating firms have been using a combination of subjective and objective metrics.
The Credit Suzeys study shows the rating agencies have an advantage over their competitors because they know more about how banks are performing and have more data.
The US banks’ ratings are now so strong that the only way they could ever get worse is if something really bad happens to the US economy, like a bank goes under.
But it’s hard for banks to survive if they don’t get the ratings they need.
And the risk that their credit rating could be downgraded is just too great, the analysts say.
If you want to understand why banks are so important to the American economy, you should read Credit Suqes report.
Banks that are rated above junk are not just riskier.
They are also more expensive to operate, and their customers are less likely to shop at them.
To be fair, the ratings are based on a wide variety of factors.
They take into account the quality of the financial products the banks provide, and how much they charge for services.
But Credit Suzes analysis doesn’t take into consideration the quality or reliability of those products.
The only thing it does take into accounting is how much it’s paying the banks for their services.
That could be based on the number of customers who actually get those services.
The biggest risk for the US banking system is that the government will intervene to force some kind of bailout, which could happen if there is a financial crisis.
If that happens, it would likely be to the tune of $15 trillion.
If you’re interested in reading more about the Credit Suzes findings, you can find them in their study.
Here’s a quick summary of the CreditSuzeys findings.
While the rating agency says that a rating system is good for the economy, it doesn’t necessarily reflect how it is working for the banks.
“The rating agency has a responsibility to help the financial system remain sustainable, and we have consistently shown that we do not deliver the best ratings for the financial institutions we rate,” said Credit Suza.
“Our results show that our credit rating agency rating system, while providing a reliable and useful source of information, is not a good tool for assessing the financial health of the U.S. financial system.”
“While it is important to credit credit rating systems with providing a basis for investors and clients to compare banks and their financial health, the rating industry has a long history of using subjective metrics to produce low-quality ratings,” said Jonathan Shire, senior director of global risk and macroeconomics at Credit Suseys.
“The problem with this practice is that it leads to an uneven and misleading view of credit rating and has led to significant overrating of credit quality.”